Are P values the “gold standard” for statistically significant findings? From an article today that appeared today in Nature:
"The irony is that when UK statistician Ronald Fisher introduced the P value in the 1920s, he did not mean it to be a definitive test. He intended it simply as an informal way to judge whether evidence was significant in the old-fashioned sense: worthy of a second look." In the era of “big data” and automated algorithms that can test thousands of correlations, we are essentially guaranteed to find statistical significant P values in our analyses.